Skip to main content

20210728-114618-91

Attention

This website is under construction. Please send questions or comments to bjanttac@usdoj.gov.

Questions?

Submitted by Ms. Jenna Lapidus on

Monthly Status:
The CAPPAC funding subcommittee met on April 9. CSG Justice Center staff (1) offered brief historical context for providing formula funding to probation/community corrections agencies, highlighting Minnesota, Oregon, and Texas; and (2) provided (with the actual presentation by PCCD staff) a depiction of the substantial impact on funding, for one county in each county class, of using any single one of the factors discussed to this point (and for which data is available). Compared to the outdated grant-in-aid formula, the largest counties (particularly Philadelphia) and the smallest counties would lose considerable funding in any scenario. The subcommittee agreed to slow their process, rather than vote on a formula approach as planned, for further exploration of data and ideas.
New Insights:

Broadly, two new opportunities for data and questions about data came to light in April. First, data on risk levels of people under supervision by local departments may be newly available but will need to be standardized across different risk assessment instruments; work is underway to do this. Second, Philadelphia Municipal Court (MC) is not required to report sentences to the Sentencing Commission (PCS), since PCS limits reporting requirements to courts of record. For the same reason, Magisterial District Judge (MDJ) courts in other counties do not report dispositions/sentences to the PCS. And while Philadelphia MC has broader jurisdiction (cases with maximum of five years), it and MDJ courts in many counties place individuals on probation. It appeared the best source of information on orders of probation by these courts is the AOPC (from management systems styled MDJCMS & CPCMS). An attempt to supplement PCS data on sentences to probation with AOPC data on sentences to probation revealed major differences (even outside Philadelphia) as depicted below. Further analysis is underway, for example to reconcile “people” being counted by PCS, and “cases” being counted by AOPC.

PCS AOPC
Example
Counties by Class 2019 Probation Sentences 2019 Probation Sentences
Philadelphia 808 12,589
Allegheny 5,394 10,938
Montgomery 2,685 6,772
Lancaster 1,079 4,278
Monroe 528 1,450
Blair 566 1,400
Elk 207 271
Wyoming 63 73
Sullivan 12 16
State Total 37,336 93,968

TTA Short Name
Pennsylvania Probation Funding TA (Apr 2021)
Status of Deliverable
Type of Agency
Provider Reference
TTA Title
Pennsylvania Probation Funding TA (April 2021)
TTA Point of Contact
TTAR Source
Deliverable Markup for Questions

Please check the box next to the following questions if the answer is 'yes'.

Is this TTA in support of implementing or maintaining an evidence-based or promising practice?
Yes
Is this TTA in response to emerging public safety needs?
Yes
Demographic - Gender
Target Audience
TTA Program Area
Program Area - Sub Topics
Demographic - Age
Demographic - Race
TTA Estimated Costs
Demographic - Ethnicity
Demographic - Other
BJA Grant Manager
Recipient Agency Scope
No
Event Date Markup

Please enter the applicable Event Date if there is an Event associated with this TTA.
When entering an Event Date, the Time is also required.

Display event on public TTA Catalog
No
Demographics Markup

If the TTA is targeted to a particular audience or location, please complete the questions below.

Milestones Markup

Milestones are an element, activity, work product, or key task associated with completing the TTA (e.g. kick-off meeting, collect data from stake holders, deliver initial data analysis).

Please complete the fields below, if applicable, to create a milestone for this TTA.

Milestone
Milestone Title
Phone Calls
Milestone Description

• 4/1: Call with Deputy Chief Counsel and Data Exchange Project Manager of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts (AOPC) to discuss a data request to compare court system sentencing data with sentencing data from the Commission on Sentencing (PCS).
• 4/6: Call with the CAPPAC funding subcommittee (nine members) and eight PCCD staff to discuss funding formula options and data development.

Performance Metrics Markup

Please respond to the Performance Metrics below.  The Performance Metrics questions are based on the TTA Type indicated in the General Information section of the TTA.

Performance Metrics
Cover Letter Instructions

Please submit a signed letter of support from your agency’s executive or other senior staff member. The letter can be emailed to or uploaded with this request. The letter should be submitted on official letterhead and include the following information:

  1. General information regarding the request for TTA services, i.e., the who, what, where, when, and why.
  2. The organizational and/or community needs specific to the request for TTA services.
  3. The benefits or anticipated outcomes from the receipt of TTA services.

By submitting this application to BJA NTTAC, I understand that upon approval of this application for TTA, the requestor agrees to keep BJA NTTAC informed of any circumstances that may impact the delivery of the TTA, including changes in the date of the event, event cancellation, or difficulties communicating with the assigned TTA provider.

Please call [site:phone] if you need further assistance completing this application.

I Agree
Off
Archived
Off
BJA Policy Advisor
BJA Policy Division
Remote TTAC ID
0