Study/Assessment

The Fidelity Assessment Instrument was developed in order to operationalize the standards set forth in the Promising Practices Guidelines (PPGs). The instrument is divided into the same section sections and components as contained in the PPGs. The instrument scores how programs meet each component as set forth in the PPGs. The outcome of the FAI process is a report that scores how programs align with the PPGs and provides individualized recommendations for further training and technical assistance where gaps or shortcomings are identified.

The Fidelity Assessment Instrument was developed in order to operationalize the standards set forth in the Promising Practices Guidelines (PPGs). The instrument is divided into the same section sections and components as contained in the PPGs. The instrument scores how programs meet each component as set forth in the PPGs. The outcome of the FAI process is a report that scores how programs align with the PPGs and provides individualized recommendations for further training and technical assistance where gaps or shortcomings are identified.

The Fidelity Assessment Instrument was developed in order to operationalize the standards set forth in the Promising Practices Guidelines (PPGs). The instrument is divided into the same section sections and components as contained in the PPGs. The instrument scores how programs meet each component as set forth in the PPGs. The outcome of the FAI process is a report that scores how programs align with the PPGs and provides individualized recommendations for further training and technical assistance where gaps or shortcomings are identified.

The Fidelity Assessment Instrument was developed in order to operationalize the standards set forth in the Promising Practices Guidelines (PPGs). The instrument is divided into the same section sections and components as contained in the PPGs. The instrument scores how programs meet each component as set forth in the PPGs. The outcome of the FAI process is a report that scores how programs align with the PPGs and provides individualized recommendations for further training and technical assistance where gaps or shortcomings are identified.

NRTAC member Joseph Milek was to attend the 2024 LeadsOnline Conference in Kansas City, MO. As part of the NRTAC’s participation, Joseph was to attend the conference events to network with current local CGIC grantees and learn about existing violent crime reduction strategies initiatives to support violent crime reduction across the United States. Unfortunately, due to an unforeseen scheduling conflict, Joseph wasn't able to attend the conference.

The NRTAC staff hosted a virtual meeting over Zoom to deliver the CGIC recommendations to the Jefferson County, Colorado, CGIC. Upon delivery of the recommendations, the Jefferson County CGIC team was prepared to discuss implementation plans for each recommendation.

The NRTAC staff hosted a virtual meeting over Zoom to deliver the CGIC recommendations to the St. Petersburg, Florida, CGIC. Upon delivery of the recommendations, the St. Petersburg CGIC team was prepared to discuss implementation plans for each recommendation.

The NRTAC staff hosted an in-person meeting to deliver the CGIC recommendations to the Tucson, Arizona, CGIC. Upon delivery of the recommendations, the Tucson CGIC team was prepared to discuss implementation plans for each recommendation.

The NRTAC staff hosted an in-person meeting to deliver the CGIC recommendations to the Pinal County, Arizona, CGIC. Upon delivery of the recommendations, the Pinal County CGIC team was prepared to discuss implementation plans for each recommendation.

The NRTAC staff hosted a virtual meeting over Zoom to deliver the CGIC recommendations to the Pitt County, North Carolina, CGIC. Upon delivery of the recommendations, the Pitt County CGIC team was prepared to discuss implementation plans for each recommendation.