Technology Implementation - Privacy Policy

IIR SME's facilitated the weekly privacy policy update meeting via teleconference, where participants reviewed the updated draft, discussed pending action items, and potential new content to add to the draft.

The Privacy Policy Update Working Group met via teleconference to discuss and approved the proposed edits to various definitions, content in appendices. Since the IIR SME was on travel, DHS CRCL served as discussion leader, and IIR provided talking points to DHS to facilitate and lead the discussion, keeping the membership on track for accomplishing goals set and defining action items for the next week.

The weekly meeting with federal and SLTT partners took place, reviewing sections on Sharing and Disclosure, as well as reviewing proposed definition changes and content on Retention, as well as discussing any pending action items from the membership.

IIR SME's met with SLTT partners and the NSI director to discuss the retention section of the privacy policy template draft, specifically covering concerns about criminal intelligence files review, retention, and purging.

IIR SME and PPWG Chair hosted a meeting via teleconference with representatives from DHS to discuss the use of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) within the Privacy Policy Template update, per an action item from the weekly PPWG call.

The Privacy Policy Working Group began meeting via teleconference weekly to update the draft, to include definition changes, and other appendices content.

The PPWG met to discuss revisions made to the privacy policy template draft and address action items and concerns from federal and SLTT stakeholders.

This task team was formed, in part, in response to a document drafted by members of the Criminal Justice Technology Forecasting Group (CJTFG), supported by RAND on behalf of BJA, to support the following task approved by the GESC: Solve specific justice/health exchanges using consistent architectural approaches to minimize costs and increase interoperability.

This task team was formed, in part, in response to a document drafted by members of the Criminal Justice Technology Forecasting Group (CJTFG), supported by RAND on behalf of BJA, to support the following task approved by the GESC: Solve specific justice/health exchanges using consistent architectural approaches to minimize costs and increase interoperability.

This task team was formed, in part, in response to a document drafted by members of the Criminal Justice Technology Forecasting Group (CJTFG), supported by RAND on behalf of BJA, to support the following task approved by the GESC: Solve specific justice/health exchanges using consistent architectural approaches to minimize costs and increase interoperability.